Written by Karen Gellender firstname.lastname@example.org Friday, 28 December 2012 00:00
The standard thing to do in this case would be start with “my thoughts and prayers go out to the victims of the school shooting in Newtown, CT and their families,” only that would be dishonest because I don’t pray. That’s not an anti-religious statement; I respect the kind of intellectual puzzle that prayer can present, that simultaneous desire for both total humility and divine attention, but it’s never been something that I do personally.
All I can do is participate in the dialogue everyone says we should be having on gun control. However, I tire of each side making a cartoon villain out of the other, and it’s especially bad this time around; after such a particularly senseless attack, targeting the most innocent possible victims, proponents of stricter gun control practically can’t help viewing advocates of gun ownership as evil monsters with children’s blood on their hands, while gun advocates, feeling cornered, are doubling down even more on their dogma of individual freedom as the bedrock of the American spirit. The severity of the event that necessitated that we address this issue now makes it especially unlikely that anyone involved will have a cool enough head to make the right decisions, but there’s no choice.
Gun control is one issue where I feel everyone on both sides manages to be simultaneously wrong most of the time; every argument is logically flawed, every statistic offered gives you a warped view of the situation, and people are especially inclined use powerful emotional appeals as weapons. Of course, this probably what you expect from me at this point: I’m a centrist. I’m always trying to advocate for the existentially challenged middle ground. However, gun control is a little different for some reason: it seems like both sides are a little more extreme, a little more calcified and uncompromising than usual. Only abortion is worse.
In the interest of full disclosure, I grew up with guns in the house. My father, a target shooter, collects and actively shoots his guns, always at paper targets. To him, guns are similar to another passion, ham radio; just like he used to have fun building radios from scratch as a kid, guns are fascinating little machines that intrigue his engineer’s brain. He’s a collector, a marksman, and couldn’t have less interest in hunting anything.
So from a very young age, I always saw guns in a non-violent context. I knew there was potential for violence (“every gun is loaded”), but I just didn’t see them that way. That doesn’t mean I don’t understand the tremendous threat that guns pose in the wrong hands, especially now, but I can’t help it: if we’re playing a word association game and you say “guns,” I’ll probably say “Daddy!” long before “cold-blooded murder of the innocent.” It’s just how I’m wired.
This was especially fun growing up in an otherwise left-leaning household, I should add. Socially liberal gun owners may as well be unicorns for all the serious attention they get from any candidate or party.
All that said, that doesn’t mean I’m in favor of maintaining the status quo. I can’t imagine any sane person isn’t asking right now what can be done to keep guns out of the hands of people with serious mental problems. However, the proposed solutions I’ve been hearing so far are all too knee-jerk, like a complete gun ban. Recent history is filled with instances of a tyrannical government incarcerating and/or slaughtering an unarmed populace; that’s the reason my family never researches our European relatives, because we don’t really want to know how many died in the Holocaust. True, I doubt if we banned firearms the U.S. would become just like the Third Reich in a matter of seconds, but as much as we may wish they were, the concerns that led the founders to pen the second amendment aren’t irrelevant; as long as power corrupts and people are capable of doing horrible things out of fear, I don’t see how they could be.
Furthermore, even if a gun ban were feasible here, it wouldn’t yield the same results for us as it has in the UK and Australia, as I’ve heard many try to suggest; bans of any kind do historically poorly here, and we have too many guns in circulation that aren’t going to just disappear. There is no easy fix; we have to discuss some very difficult subjects, and pose questions where there are no right answers, only more or less tolerable ones. Questions like: How do we interpret the second amendment now that weapons function so differently than they did in the days when the Constitution was written? How do we determine who is too mentally ill to be in spitting distance of a gun, when millions upon millions of Americans take psychoactive drugs for mood disorders, depression and compulsive disorders, and even those who don’t take pills are likely to have some degree of narcissism or other disorder?
What gun control measures can be effectively handled by law enforcement, and what effect will the logistics of that enforcement have on police departments? How do we begin to hold the media accountable when no individual film, game, or show is responsible for an act of violence in any practical sense, but the saturation of gun-centric fantasy violence can’t be overlooked as a contributing factor?
This is where I should probably wrap up by saying, “I don’t presume to have all the answers,” and I don’t, but I do have one: stop wasting time and talk it out like proper adults. If you’re on the left, stop calling the NRA monstrous child-killers; it won’t make you feel any better, and it won’t change anything. If you’re on the right, stop hiding behind the second amendment as though it’s some kind of absolute, since the question of interpreting it for modern technology was always going to be our responsibility. And if you’re in the middle, well I suppose I’m just glad that you exist.
Last Updated (Monday, 29 November 1999 19:00) Wednesday, 01 October 2014 00:00
The Sewanhaka Central High School District selected Brentwood-based Park East Construction as its bond construction management firm last week. The group will oversee the $86.6 million in improvements coming to the district. Park East will analyze school architect Wiedersum Associates’ plans before applying for New York State Education Department approval.
“They are going to make sure the [firms that win district contracts] do the work right,” District Superintendent Dr. Ralph Ferrie said. “They’re going to make sure [the engineer’s] drawings are right before they are sent up to New York State. [Park East] reports directly to the architect and the Board of Education to make sure what we say we’re going to do is done well.”
Last Updated (Tuesday, 23 September 2014 10:07) Saturday, 27 September 2014 00:00
The Sept. 18 meeting of the Herricks Board of Education covered a range of issues, from the district’s overall performance to the sudden death of a student to fiscal and personnel issues—even to the loss of maple trees.
Superintendent of Schools Dr. John Bierwirth announced that the district’s high school had achieved an impressive level of distinction in a recent national survey that measured scholastic achievement; in fact, a great deal of Long Island made the cut, he said.
Thursday, 25 September 2014 00:00
Seniors Daniella Ford and Margie Londono highlight a Sewanhaka Indians girls soccer team vying for its second straight winning season.
Ford, who is in her fourth season as starting goalie for the Indians, netted a season-high 24 saves in a 3-1 loss to Valley Stream Central.
“She’s a stud back there,” said Sewanhaka third-year coach Eric Premisler, whose team is 0-3 as of press time, after going 8-3-1 last season. “If we can stop a team from taking five shots because of good defense, Daniella is going to stop another 15 shots. And we’re going to have a chance to win every game.”
Thursday, 25 September 2014 00:00
The Sewanhaka Indians continue to let their presence be felt in Nassau Conference II.
The Indians played their second game as members of the conference on Saturday, Sept. 21, against the Long Beach Marines, topping the south shore squad 51-30.
On the opening drive, the Indians relied on running back Brenton Mighty’s legs to get them into the red zone. On first and goal from the 15-yard line, quarterback Elijah Tracey hit
Michael Parasconda on a screen pass for the first score.