Anton Community Newspapers  •  132 East 2nd Street  •  Mineola, NY 11501  •  Phone: 516-747-8282  •  FAX: 516-742-5867

Bob McMillanAn Opinion

By Bob McMillan
Presidents v. The Supreme Court

The recent political chatter about “Obamacare” before the Supreme Court of the United States got a great deal of media attention.  President Obama added fuel to the fire when he declared, “Ultimately, I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.”

For someone who was a law professor those words were absurd.  Even if a bill passed unanimously in the house and senate, it could still be overturned – if the law was in violation of the Constitution.


Michael Miller

Viewpoint

By Michael Miller
Yellow Margarine And A Pitch For The Ages

In early 1946, a brouhaha erupted between the AFL and the CIO, the state’s rival federations of labor groups. Republican leaders in the state legislature endorsed the upstate-oriented AFL’s proposal that New York license and regulate barbers and cosmetologists. The downstate-oriented CIO, which had members who couldn’t document the required formal education, launched opposition so fierce and threatened political retaliation so severe that the legislation was considered dead. And then, as the 1946 session was drawing to a close and the CIO was concentrating on other things, the “barber and hairdresser bills” started moving through both houses, with almost total Republican support and Democratic opposition. Member of Assembly Genesta Strong, first-termer from Nassau County, dependable, safe and already expected to step aside, was asked to be the official sponsor of the cosmetologist licensing bill.

Governor Dewey’s signing of the bill cemented support for his re-election from the powerful AFL, which had been the whole point. To those in political inner circles, Mrs. Strong had proved herself a reliable team player whose dignity was useful in deflecting potential attack.


Mike BarryEye on the Island

By Mike Barry
Sustainable LI: Getting Good Things Done

Farmingdale-based Sustainable Long Island is hosting its eighth annual Sustainability Conference on Friday, April 4, at Carlyle on the Green, at Bethpage State Park.

The event will run from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m., and traditionally draws hundreds of people from all walks of life: government, business and not-for-profits. This year’s theme is “Accomplishing More Together.” Tickets are $75 per person, which includes the cost of lunch.


Cuomo Campaign Taps Taxpayers For Help

The Cuomo administration has expended millions of taxpayer dollars for television ads aimed at promoting state government and burnishing Governor Andrew Cuomo’s image. The latter goal is a tough sell, a Siena College Poll indicates.

The current taxpayer-funded TV advertising campaign began around Sandy’s one-year anniversary, and steers viewers to http://stormrecovery.ny.gov/, The Governor’s Office of Storm Recovery. Narrated by actor Chazz Palminteri, the slick spot closes with a visual tag line which says “Better than before.”

At the storm recovery website, you can read about government programs aimed at assisting Sandy victims. Yet should the Office of Storm Recovery’s website also include the picture of a person holding a sign which says, “Gov. Cuomo, Thank You for Giving Ocean Breeze Closure?” No, it shouldn’t.

The context: the governor has authorized the expenditure of taxpayer monies under the NY Rising Housing Recovery Program to acquire up to 129 properties in Ocean Breeze, a Staten Island neighborhood hit hard by Sandy. The program is completely voluntary but, if the sales price is right — and it is difficult to imagine New York State is driving a hard bargain — what’s not to like for an Ocean Breeze property owner? The parcels purchased by the state will remain as open space and, as public policy goes, it is a prudent move. But why must the state then applaud the governor, on a state-run website, for taking such an action? The answer: so Cuomo 2014’s campaign monies need not be used for this purpose.

Taxpayers, not gubernatorial campaign donors, also funded the state’s Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) spring 2013 television ad buy, which ran for weeks. It touted the “New” New York, an amazing place where the economy is expanding, taxes are being cut, and regulatory burdens are being lifted. The “New” New York exists only in the mind of the advertising copywriter who penned the script and online at www.thenewny.com, the website to which TV viewers were sent by the ESDC. Would it surprise you to learn that the governor’s picture is one of the first things you see at that website’s home page?

Taxpayers, perhaps recognizing their money is being spent in this manner, are underwhelmed with the job performance of the person overseeing the state’s executive branch. The Siena College poll found last month that 39 percent of New Yorkers thought Cuomo was doing a “fair” job while another 17 percent believe the governor is doing a “poor” job. That left 44 percent of the electorate saying the governor was doing an “excellent” (seven percent) or “good” (37 percent) job. In the name of full disclosure, Siena found Governor Cuomo, in head-to-head matchups against prospective Republican candidates, secured 60-plus percent of the statewide vote. Still, if 56 percent of New Yorkers surveyed are giving you a “fair” or “poor” job approval rating, when “excellent” and “good” are options offered to them as well, that cannot be encouraging news.

The thing that bothers me most about all this is that the people whose full-time job it is to cover the Cuomo administration seem to neither notice nor care about the copious use of taxpayer monies to promote certain state agencies directly, and the governor indirectly, on television. Indeed, a front page story in The New York Times late last month had this headline: “Forget TV; to Spread Word, Cuomo’s on Radio.” The article, which must have been written by a reporter without a TV, or one that’s never on, included this preposterous passage: “Half a century after politicians embraced television as a favored means of communication, Mr. Cuomo has determinedly adopted radio as his medium of choice. Week after week, year after year, when he wants to make an announcement, respond to an event, or just chat, he picks up the phone and calls a radio host.”

Well, that’s technically true, I guess. When the governor wants to communicate a message on television, he has no need to pick up the phone. The taxpayers are paying for advertising agencies and media buyers who will do that for him.