The recent political chatter about “Obamacare” before the Supreme Court of the United States got a great deal of media attention. President Obama added fuel to the fire when he declared, “Ultimately, I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.”
For someone who was a law professor those words were absurd. Even if a bill passed unanimously in the house and senate, it could still be overturned – if the law was in violation of the Constitution.
Giving up is not “reform.” County Executive Ed Mangano’s proposal to transfer property assessment from the county to the towns might possibly speed up assessment decisions by replacing one large and overwhelmed bureaucracy with several somewhat smaller ones. It will likely recreate problems that were major motivations in creating our highly centralized county government 75 years ago.
The 1938 county charter merged the town Boards of Assessors and the County Board of Equalization, ending three decades of complaints, lawsuits and hard feelings about the lack of specific, uniform levels of property assessments between the towns. In a tax system screaming out for simplification, clarification and a sense of certainty, spinning off assessments to the towns will reintroduce “equalization” as an annual issue. Tens of thousands of residents are still trying to figure out why their assessment went down but their tax bill still went up. The division of taxes heading up the tax food chain in an equitable manner is the most complex subject in local government, and it’s all going to make people very sad, particularly in villages and school districts that are split between townships.
Manhattan District Attorney (D.A.) Robert Morgenthau was facing a spirited Democratic primary challenge from a former judge in 2005, but his opponent had trouble finding anything substantively negative to say about Morgenthau.
The reason I know this: a city-based tabloid newspaper reporter called me weeks before the election, asking whether it was legal to have a Manhattan driver’s license while at the same time registering and insuring a car in Dutchess County, where auto insurance premiums are much lower. The answer: yes, so long as the insured vehicle is primarily garaged in Dutchess County. I was the director of public affairs for the New York State Insurance Department at the time and knew immediately the question pertained to Morgenthau because he met those criteria.
Written by Mike Barry, MFBarry@optonline.net Tuesday, 05 March 2013 12:51
Do you ever sense a supposedly objective journalist is hoping for a certain outcome to a story he or she is covering?
Chuck Todd, NBC News’ political director and chief White House correspondent, was openly rooting for President Obama’s re-election last year. Every time I heard Todd, it was always Good Friday for Governor Romney, and Easter Sunday for the president.
But I don’t recall Todd telling NBC’s viewers he had a book in the works on the Obama administration. Instead, Amazon.com was tasked with telling the world Todd was writing a tome, to be published in June 2013. Here’s the Amazon promotional blurb: “In UNTITLED ON PRESIDENT OBAMA, Chuck Todd draws upon his unprecedented inner-circle sources to create a gripping account of Obama’s tumultuous first term and campaign to win another. And not only does he give us the most revealing portrait of this fascinating president and his struggles, Todd also seeks to define what ‘Obamism’ really is, what the president stands for, and how his decisions have changed—and will change—American politics for generations.”
Look, no one is completely objective, and it is clearly difficult for Todd to criticize people who are implementing policies Todd favors, or to cause trouble for folks who provide him access to sensitive information. Yet a degree of objectivity is precisely what voters needed in 2012 from NBC News, and they weren’t getting it from Todd because he stood to gain personally and professionally from another four years with this president in office.
PBS’s Gwen Ifill faced comparable criticism during the 2008 election cycle before Ifill moderated that year’s vice presidential debate between U.S. Senator Joseph Biden and Governor Sarah Palin. The Republicans rightfully asked how Ifill could be an honest broker when she was working during her off hours on a project that would become February 2009’s The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama. The book was built not only around the president’s career, but also those of three other Democrats who held elective office at the time: Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, Newark, New Jersey Mayor Cory Booker and an Alabama Congressman who has since become a Republican so he’ll never again be on Ifill’s radar unless he becomes a GOP vice presidential nominee.
Closer to home, did you know the New York Post’s Albany bureau chief, Fred Dicker, who has distinguished himself as an unrepentant admirer of Governor Cuomo, is writing a biography about his favorite politician, with the cooperation of the governor’s staff? News Corporation is obviously comfortable with this arrangement because News Corp. owns both The New York Post and HarperCollins, the publisher that signed Dicker to write the book.
Still, a New York Post reader has reason to wonder whether some state governmental or political stories are being held for the book, rather than being written about when Dicker first learns of them. News Corp. doesn’t care because whatever information Dicker gathers and shares with readers will be distributed through an outlet the company controls.
City & State offered a highly critical take on Dicker’s Cuomo biography last year when the deal was first announced, polling its readers on what the book’s title should be. The winning entry is one I won’t repeat because the second most-popular choice seems a more likely assessment of the final product: The Greatest Governor in the History of Time: How One Man Changed Albany, and Then the World.